<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/stylesheets/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Handwriting: Email as a collaboration tool</title>
    <link>http://blog.handwire.com/articles/2006/04/04/email-as-a-collaboration-tool</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>A blog by Handwire</description>
    <item>
      <title>Email as a collaboration tool</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Found on slashdot today&amp;#8230;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
So, why are Collaboration Software Vendors (Central Desktop included), keen on vilifying email and so quick to promise a practical alternative to the chaos of email? And, if the vendor&amp;#8217;s software is so much better than email, than why do users revert back to email as soon as they hit a snag in the system? Why do users refuse to adopt collaboration software? 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.centraldesktop.com/comments.php?y=06&amp;#38;m=04&amp;#38;entry=entry060403-214628"&gt;The Good In Email (or Why Email Is Still The Most Adopted Collaboration Tool)&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Interesting read. Reminds me of all the times I&amp;#8217;ve built a tool that gathered dust while the people who it was written for continue to use Excel.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sigh.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 10:37:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:c6c8ee97-9c5f-4db8-bce1-8ef3a6a221ae</guid>
      <author>Skip</author>
      <link>http://blog.handwire.com/articles/2006/04/04/email-as-a-collaboration-tool</link>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.handwire.com/articles/trackback/45</trackback:ping>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
