<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/stylesheets/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Handwriting: Tag gettingreal</title>
    <link>http://blog.handwire.com/articles/tag/gettingreal?tag=gettingreal</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>A blog by Handwire</description>
    <item>
      <title>Modern Management</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Cynics call it &amp;#8220;Bubble 2.0&amp;#8221;, others call it &amp;#8220;Web 2.0&amp;#8221;, and everyone is full of opinions.  Caterina Fake says it&amp;#8217;s a &lt;a href="http://www.caterina.net/archive/000965.html"&gt;bad time to start a company&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://37signals.com/svn/archives2/its_a_great_time_to_start_a_business.php"&gt;many&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.blueflavor.com/ed/startups/anytime_is_the_right_time_to_s.php"&gt;others&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://garage.ngenworks.com/workbench/time-to-close-the-internet"&gt;disagree&lt;/a&gt;.  For better or worse, Handwire is &lt;em&gt;running&lt;/em&gt; a company right now, and, at the least, we&amp;#8217;re inspired by what Kathy Sierra calls &lt;a href="http://headrush.typepad.com/creating_passionate_users/2006/03/manager_20.html"&gt;management 2.0&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;Before this movement grew a label, the founding partners of Handwire started a company that already had what are now considered the right ingredients for success.  It was a small company from the start and remains that way by choice.  The team was built based on shared passions, curiosity and the desire to innovate rather than &amp;#8220;x years of experience in x technology&amp;#8221;.  Through it all, the secretive and dictatorial atmosphere that Sierra labels &lt;em&gt;so 1.0&lt;/em&gt; has never really taken hold around here.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;My favorite quote from the comments of Sierra&amp;#8217;s post:&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;blockquote&gt;A resume itself is kind of 1.0ish&amp;#8230; in a 2.0 world, you don&amp;#8217;t list your accomplishments &amp;#8211; the hiring team knows about you because they&amp;#8217;ve seen your work on the web. They know you have technical chops not because they&amp;#8217;ve grilled you on pointers in an interview, but because they&amp;#8217;ve collaborated with you on an open source project. They know about your speaking and communication skills because they saw your demo at a User Group, or your talk at a conference. They don&amp;#8217;t rely on references they&amp;#8217;ve never met &amp;#8211; they could &lt;strong&gt;be&lt;/strong&gt; your references.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;I like this idea, though I&amp;#8217;m not sure how scalable it is.  (If all of a sudden one day everyone up and decides to start collaborating on Open Source projects and speaking at conferences, most people would still only know of a select few by reputation.) Still, the idea behind it is a clear improvement on the way people both establish and evaluate professional experience.  Wouldn&amp;#8217;t you rather hire some one who you&amp;#8217;re familiar with by reputation than based on their own claims about their skills?  It&amp;#8217;s a better situation for companies, individuals &lt;em&gt;and&lt;/em&gt; clients.  Why clients? Because they&amp;#8217;ll have a much better experience if it&amp;#8217;s delivered by happy, passionate individuals.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 21:27:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:92b7ec15-61ac-4229-ac72-11f23df82ef1</guid>
      <author>Kristina B</author>
      <link>http://blog.handwire.com/articles/2006/04/05/modern-management</link>
      <category>kathysierra</category>
      <category>web20</category>
      <category>gettingreal</category>
      <trackback:ping>http://blog.handwire.com/articles/trackback/46</trackback:ping>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
